Sunday, 31 March 2013

The Dilemma of the MMDA


The Metro Manila Development Authority otherwise known as the MMDA, was established in the 1970s by the Marcos presidency. Under Republic Act 7924, the MMDA was mandated to “The formulation, coordination, & monitoring of policies, standards, programs and projects to rationalize the existing transport operations, infrastructure requirements, the use of thoroughfares, and promotion of safe and convenient movement of persons and goods, provision for mass transport systems and the institution of a system to regulate road users, and administration and implementation of all traffic enforcement operations, traffic engineering services and traffic education education programs, including the institution of a single ticketing system in Metropolitan Manila.[1]

The MMDA’s programs are all designed in accordance with their mandate, they make every effort to ensure that their programs are for the benefit of Metro Manila, but ultimately, to the motorists that traverse the roads.
MMDA has identified 7 major corridors in which they concentrate their efforts and enforcement on. These are:
  • ·      Commonwealth Avenue;
  • ·      C-4 (EDSA);
  • ·      R-10 (Radial Road 10);
  • ·      C-5 (Circumferential Road 5);
  • ·      Quezon Avenue;
  • ·      Marcos Highway; and
  • ·      Mc Arthur Highway.[2]

MMDA believes that concentrating their efforts on these roads and increasing the funding on their development will impact the lives of the Metro Manilans in a bigger way. Though these roads are fewer, they are major thoroughfares.

The MMDA contributes to the traffic situation in Manila in a positive way for a lot of reasons. They create programs that ensure that the motorists have a concrete traffic regulation system to bank on. They have enough personnel to regulate the 7 major corridors of Metro Manila, and the rest of the major roads that they are deployed in. The leadership of MMDA has a strict system of regulating their staff. Any employee who has been reported or complained about is investigated and if necessary imposed with the necessary sanctions. Each of their staff undergoes strict training seminars to ensure that they understand the work that MMDA requires of them.
Problems regarding the effectiveness of their enforcement appear at the lowest level of enforcers. Though the staff of MMDA in the main office takes significant strides to ensure their credibility and integrity, the traffic enforcers and their supervisors are exposed to the lingering notion that they can be bribed. Based on interviews done by the MMDA on their staff, they found that the motorists already try to get out of their violations by giving bribes even when the officers are not asking for them anymore. The reason why these enforcers accept bribes is the fact that they are underpaid. MMDA, being subsidized by the government, is heavily reliant on any funds that the government gives them. This creates a problem because the enforcers need money to sustain their families.

Illegal terminals contribute to the traffic situation and are connected to the MMDA problems because as stated above, the enforcers are underpaid. These terminals give bribes to the enforcers to allow them to conduct their operations in that area. Though the main office is taking significant measures to combat these illegal terminals, they are still there. 


[1] Taken from PDF: MMDA’s Major Traffic and Transport Programs by Angelito S. Vergel De Dios, Director III Traffic Operations Center.
[2] Taken from PDF: MMDA’s Major Traffic and Transport Programs by Angelito S. Vergel De Dios, Director III Traffic Operations Center.

No comments:

Post a Comment